Question

ban the ban; sodas a problem but... (with three cheers for the nanny state)
which idea does the author of \three cheers for the nanny state\ promote that is unacceptable to the authors of \ban the ban\ and \sodas a problem but...\?
the government should sometimes intervene in order to keep people from harming themselves.
people should be given information to help them make smarter decisions.
people sometimes make choices that are not in their own best interests.
banning smoking in public places was necessary and fair.

Explanation:

"Three Cheers for the Nanny State" advocates for state intervention to protect people from self-harm, which directly conflicts with the anti-interventionist stance implied by "Ban the Ban" and "Soda's a Problem but...", which prioritize individual choice over government restrictions on personal behaviors like soda consumption or smoking bans. The other options focus on information access, recognizing poor personal choices, or specific smoking ban support, which do not represent the core disagreeable interventionist principle.

Answer:

The government should sometimes intervene in order to keep people from harming themselves.