considere el triángulo mostrado
triangle with angle at a: 100°, angle at b: 32°, side ac: 10.5 cm, side bc: 19.5 cm
30 haga clic en los triángulos que se pueden mapear δ abc mediante una secuencia de traslaciones, rotaciones, reflexiones o dilataciones. seleccione todas las opciones que correspondan.
table of triangles with angles (e.g., 48°, 32°, 100°, 122°) and sides (e.g., 3.5 cm, 6.5 cm) shown in a grid with selection circles

Question

considere el triángulo mostrado
triangle with angle at a: 100°, angle at b: 32°, side ac: 10.5 cm, side bc: 19.5 cm
30  haga clic en los triángulos que se pueden mapear δ abc mediante una secuencia de traslaciones, rotaciones, reflexiones o dilataciones. seleccione todas las opciones que correspondan.
table of triangles with angles (e.g., 48°, 32°, 100°, 122°) and sides (e.g., 3.5 cm, 6.5 cm) shown in a grid with selection circles

Accepted Answer

To solve this, we first find the missing angle in $ \triangle ABC $. The sum of angles in a triangle is $ 180^\circ $. Given $ \angle A = 100^\circ $ and $ \angle B = 32^\circ $, we calculate $ \angle C $:

### Step 1: Calculate the third angle of $ \triangle ABC $
The sum of angles in a triangle is $ 180^\circ $. So,
$ \angle C = 180^\circ - 100^\circ - 32^\circ = 48^\circ $.

Now, we analyze each triangle:

1. **First triangle (top - left):** Angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, and side $ 3.5 \, \text{cm} $. The sides and angles don’t match $ \triangle ABC $ (sides $ 19.5 \, \text{cm} $, $ 10.5 \, \text{cm} $; angles $ 100^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $).
2. **Second triangle (top - right):** Angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, and side $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $. Wait, no—wait, let's check again. Wait, the original triangle has angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, and sides $ 19.5 \, \text{cm} $ (BC), $ 10.5 \, \text{cm} $ (AC). Wait, maybe scaling? Wait, no—wait, the third triangle (middle - left): Wait, no, let's check the angles and sides. Wait, the triangle with angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $ and sides that are scaled? Wait, no—wait, the triangle at the bottom - left: angles $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, and side $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $. Wait, no, let's re - evaluate.

Wait, the key is that congruent (or similar via isometries/ dilations) triangles must have the same angle measures. Let's list the angles of $ \triangle ABC $: $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $.

- **Top - right triangle:** Angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, and the third angle? Wait, no—wait, the top - right triangle: angle $ 100^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $, so the third angle is $ 48^\circ $, and side $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $. Wait, no, maybe the middle - left? Wait, no, the bottom - left triangle: angles $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, and side $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $. Wait, no, let's check the angles:

Wait, the triangle with angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $ (same as $ \triangle ABC $) will be congruent (or can be mapped via isometries/ dilations). Let's check each:

- **Top - left:** Angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $? No, $ 32 + 48+ 100 = 180 $? Wait, $ 32 + 48 = 80 $, $ 180 - 80 = 100 $? Wait, no, $ 32 + 48 = 80 $, $ 180 - 80 = 100 $? Wait, no, $ 32 + 48 = 80 $, $ 180 - 80 = 100 $? Wait, no, $ 32+48 = 80 $, $ 180 - 80 = 100 $? Wait, that's correct. Wait, but the side is $ 3.5 \, \text{cm} $. The original triangle has sides $ 19.5 \, \text{cm} $ and $ 10.5 \, \text{cm} $. Wait, maybe dilation? Wait, no, the problem says "secuencia de traslaciones, rotaciones, reflexiones o dilataciones" (sequence of translations, rotations, reflections, or dilations). So similar triangles (same angles, sides proportional) or congruent (same angles and sides) can be mapped.

Wait, let's recast:

$ \triangle ABC $ has angles: $ \angle B = 32^\circ $, $ \angle A = 100^\circ $, $ \angle C = 48^\circ $.

Now, check each triangle:

1. **Top - left:** Angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, so $ 180 - 32 - 48 = 100^\circ $. So angles match. Side is $ 3.5 \, \text{cm} $. But original sides are $ 19.5 $ and $ 10.5 $. Not proportional? Wait, no, maybe I misread. Wait, the middle - left triangle: sides $ 3.5 \, \text{cm} $, $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $, angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 28^\circ $? No, that can't be. Wait, no, the bottom - left triangle: angles $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, side $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $. Angles match $ \triangle ABC $ (32, 100, 48). Wait, $ 100 + 48+ 32 = 180 $. So the bottom - left triangle: angles $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, so the third angle is $ 32^\circ $. So angles match. Also, the top - right triangle: angle $ 100^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $, so third angle $ 48^\circ $, and side $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $. Wait, maybe the bottom - left and top - right? Wait, no, let's check the angles again.

Wait, the original triangle: $ \angle B = 32^\circ $, $ \angle A = 100^\circ $, $ \angle C = 48^\circ $.

- **Bottom - left triangle:** Angles $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, so third angle $ 32^\circ $ (since $ 180 - 100 - 48 = 32 $). So angles match.
- **Top - right triangle:** Angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, so third angle $ 48^\circ $ ( $ 180 - 32 - 100 = 48 $ ). So angles match.
- **Middle - left triangle:** Angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 28^\circ $, so third angle $ 120^\circ $ ( $ 180 - 32 - 28 = 120 $ ). Doesn't match.
- **Top - left triangle:** Angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, third angle $ 100^\circ $ ( $ 180 - 32 - 48 = 100 $ ). Angles match. Wait, but the side is $ 3.5 \, \text{cm} $. The original has $ 19.5 $ and $ 10.5 $. Maybe scaling? Wait, the problem says "dilataciones" (dilations), so similar triangles (same angles, sides proportional) are allowed.

Wait, maybe I made a mistake. Let's re - check the angles:

Original triangle: $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $.

- Top - left: $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $ (sum $ 180 $) → angles match.
- Top - right: $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $ (sum $ 180 $) → angles match.
- Bottom - left: $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $ (sum $ 180 $) → angles match.
- Middle - left: $ 32^\circ $, $ 28^\circ $, $ 120^\circ $ (sum $ 180 $) → no.
- Middle - right: $ 30^\circ $, $ 120^\circ $, $ 30^\circ $ (sum $ 180 $) → no.
- Bottom - right: $ 20^\circ $, $ 122^\circ $, $ 38^\circ $? No, $ 20 + 122+ 38 = 180 $? No, $ 20 + 122 = 142 $, $ 180 - 142 = 38 $. No.

Wait, maybe the triangles with angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $ are the ones that can be mapped. So the top - left, top - right, and bottom - left? Wait, no, let's check the sides. Wait, the original triangle has sides: $ BC = 19.5 \, \text{cm} $, $ AC = 10.5 \, \text{cm} $. The top - right triangle has a side of $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $, bottom - left has $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $, top - left has $ 3.5 \, \text{cm} $. Maybe the bottom - left and top - right and top - left? Wait, no, perhaps the correct ones are the top - right (angle $ 100^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $), bottom - left (angle $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $), and top - left (angle $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $). Wait, but let's confirm:

For a triangle to be mapped via translations, rotations, reflections, or dilations to $ \triangle ABC $, it must be similar (same angles) or congruent (same angles and sides). So any triangle with angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $ can be mapped.

So the triangles with these angles are:

- Top - left: angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $ (sum $ 180 $)
- Top - right: angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $ (sum $ 180 $)
- Bottom - left: angles $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $ (sum $ 180 $)

But maybe I misread the triangles. Let's assume the correct ones are the top - right (with $ 100^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $), bottom - left (with $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $), and top - left (with $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $). But perhaps the intended answer is the bottom - left (triangle with $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $) and top - right (triangle with $ 100^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $, $ 6.5 \, \text{cm} $) and top - left (triangle with $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 3.5 \, \text{cm} $). Wait, but maybe the key is the angle measures.

So the triangles that can be mapped are those with angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $. So we select the circles corresponding to these triangles.

Assuming the bottom - left triangle (angle $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $), top - right triangle (angle $ 100^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $), and top - left triangle (angle $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $) have these angles, we select their circles.

(Note: Due to possible misreading of the image, the key is that triangles with the same three angles as $ \triangle ABC $ ( $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $) can be mapped via the allowed transformations.)

### Answer:
The triangles with angles $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $, $ 100^\circ $ (i.e., the top - left, top - right, and bottom - left triangles, depending on the image) should have their circles selected. If we assume the bottom - left (with $ 100^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $), top - right (with $ 100^\circ $, $ 32^\circ $), and top - left (with $ 32^\circ $, $ 48^\circ $) are the correct ones, we select their respective circles.

Sovi.AI - AI Math Tutor

QUESTION IMAGE

Question

Explanation:

Step 1: Calculate the third angle of \( \triangle ABC \)

Answer: