Question

developing a central idea
it may seem surprising that no confederate sympathizers took action against van lew, given her strong and public views on secession and slavery. surely there were suspicions, especially among her upper - crust neighbors, but the matter never went beyond those suspicions. historians have suggested that the secessionists were victims of their own cultural bias, believing that no aristocratic person, and certainly not a lady, would ever consider taking part in anything as impolite as spying. a true lady managed her servants, prepared parties and gatherings, and blindly supported her husband. such attitudes worked in van lews favor, diverting suspicion from her.
—the dark game,
paul janeczko
based on your reading beyond this paragraph, what is an overall central idea that the author develops in the dark game?
van lews actions of espionage were possible only because she was a woman.
van lews deviant behavior was not the norm for aristocratic people.
van lews heroism lies in that she openly spoke about her views of secession and slavery.
van lews actions revolutionized the expectation and role of women in society.

Explanation:

Van Lew's espionage work as a woman defied societal expectations of women's roles in her time, revolutionizing those expectations. The other options either over - emphasize gender as the sole factor for her espionage success (first option), focus on her deviance in a way that doesn't capture the overall significance (second option), or misidentify her heroism as just speaking out (third option).

Answer:

Van Lew's actions revolutionized the expectation and role of women in society.