Question

of the document?
it is a historical written account written account from may 1892. reliability significant aspects
close reading
write down all the words or phrases that seem particularly strong.
abolish means open declaration of war. slaughter means make the co suggesting extreme behavior
do these words make one side seem “right” or “wrong”? how do you know?
whose perspective is missing from this document?
document b: henry frick
purching
what kind of document is this? whose idea does it contain? what is his perspect
document a: emma goldman (modified)
it was may 1892. trouble had broken out between the carnegie steel company and its workers, organized in the amalgamated association of iron and steel workers. amalgamated association was one of the biggest and most efficient unions in the country, consisting mostly of strong americans, men of decision and grit, who stood up for their rights. the carnegie company, on the other hand, was a powerful corporation. andrew carnegie, its president, had turned over management to henry frick, a man known for his hatred of unions and workers.
the carnegie company enjoyed great wealth and prosperity. wages were arranged between the company and the union, according to a sliding scale based on the current market price of steel products.
andrew carnegie decided to abolish the sliding scale. the company would make no more agreements with the amalgamated association. in fact, he would not recognize the union at all. then, he closed the mills. it was an open declaration of war.
the steel - workers declared that they were ready to take up the challenge of frick; they would insist on their right to organize and to deal collectively with their employers. their tone was manly, ringing with the spirit of their rebellious forebears of the revolutionary war.
then the news flashed across the country of the slaughter of steel - workers by pinkertons. in the dead of night, frick sent a boat packed with strike - breakers and heavily armed pinkerton thugs to the mill. the workers stationed themselves on the shore, determined to drive back fricks hirelings. when the boat got within range, the pinkertons opened fire, without warning, killing a number of homestead men on the shore, among them a little boy, and wounding scores of others.
source: emma goldman was political activist and radical who fiercely supported workers rights. the document above comes from her 1917 book where she remembers her reaction to the homestead strike. she remembers the events from the homestead strike.

Explanation:

The questions involve analyzing a historical written - account. The tasks include close - reading for strong words, assessing moral implications of the language, and identifying missing perspectives. This is typical of historical analysis in the subfield of History within Social Science.

Answer:

1. For the close - reading task: Words like "abolish" and "slaughter" are strong as they suggest extreme actions. "Abolish" implies a decisive and forceful end to something (the sliding scale in this case), and "slaughter" evokes a violent and brutal image.
2. Regarding whether the words make one side seem right or wrong: The use of "abolish" by Carnegie's side and "slaughter" to describe the actions against the steel - workers makes Carnegie and his management seem in the wrong. The word "abolish" shows a unilateral and perhaps unfair decision to end an agreement, and "slaughter" clearly portrays an immoral and violent act against the workers.
3. The perspective of the common steel - workers (not just the union representatives) is missing. We mainly hear about the actions and statements of the union, the management (Carnegie and Frick), and the Pinkerton agents, but not the individual experiences and voices of the rank - and - file steel - workers.
4. Document B (assuming it's about Henry Frick) is likely a historical account or a statement from a key figure (Henry Frick). It contains Frick's ideas and perspective. His perspective is that of a powerful industrial manager who is determined to break the union and maintain control over the company, as seen from his actions like closing the mills and using Pinkerton agents to suppress the workers.