Question

evaluate:
how effective has your two - part plan been at addressing the problem of low species diversity and abundance?
a. it has been effective at increasing the numbers of certain species but not others.
b. it has been effective for all species in the area. both diversity of species and abundance have increased.
c. it has not been effective at all.
d. it has made it possible for new species that did not exist in the area before to thrive.
choose your answer below!

Explanation:

In real - world ecological restoration or conservation plans (aimed at addressing low species diversity and abundance), it's rare for a plan to be fully effective for all species (option B is too idealistic), completely ineffective (option C is extreme), or introduce and make non - native new species thrive easily (option D has issues with non - native species establishment). Usually, such plans show differential effectiveness among species, with some species' numbers increasing while others don't respond as well.

Answer:

A. It has been effective at increasing the numbers of certain species but not others.