Question

micaela tried to rotate the square 180° about the origin. is her rotation correct? if not, explain why. no, she translated the figure instead of rotating it. no, she reflected the figure instead of rotating it. no, the vertices of the image and pre - image do not correspond. yes, the rotation is correct

Explanation:

When rotating a point $(x,y)$ 180 - degrees about the origin, the new point is $(-x,-y)$. For a square with vertices, check if each vertex of the pre - image follows this rule to get to the image. In this case, the vertices of the image and pre - image do not follow the 180 - degree rotation rule about the origin.

Answer:

No, the vertices of the image and pre - image do not correspond.