Question

the moral logic of survivor guilt argument, claim, and evidence \the moral logic of survivor guilt\ is an editorial, a form of argumentative writing. as with all types of arguments, an effective editorial must include a strong claim and relevant supporting evidence. the claim is the central idea of the text - it is the position or message the writer wants readers to understand. in many arguments, the author states the claim early in the work and then revisits it throughout the text. supporting evidence may include facts (including numerical data), anecdotes, examples, quotations from experts, or other specific details that help to show the authors claim is valid and accurate. in a complete paragraph, answer the following prompt: is shermans argument well - reasoned and convincing? explain, citing specific textual details to support your views and be sure to include the claim she states in her argument. remember, a convincing argument has and does the following: a claim supporting evidence (statistics, examples, anecdotes/stories) reasoning and explanation of evidence refers back to the claim at the end follows a clear structure your answer is an argument. make sure it has/does: a claim (your answer) supporting evidence (examples) reasoning and explanation of evidence refers back to the claim at the end follows a clear structure

Explanation:

To determine if Sherman's argument is well - reasoned and convincing, we need to look for the elements of a strong argument as described. First, identify the claim she makes in the text. Then, search for supporting evidence such as facts, anecdotes, or expert quotes. Analyze how she reasons and explains the evidence to connect it to the claim. Check if she refers back to the claim at the end and if the overall structure is clear. Without the actual text by Sherman, we can't provide specific details, but this is the process to follow.

Answer:

Without the text by Sherman, it is impossible to definitively answer whether her argument is well - reasoned and convincing. However, one should first identify her claim, then look for supporting evidence, analyze the reasoning and explanation of the evidence, check for a return to the claim at the end, and assess the overall structure.