Question

question 10 in district of columbia v. heller (2008), the court a. determined that the second amendment is irrelevant in modern times. b. struck down a law prohibiting the registration and possession of firearms. c. limited the use of weapons to the federal military, standing armies, and local police. d. allowed businesses to sell particularly deadly weapons, such as sawed - off shotguns, to individuals.

Explanation:

In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme - Court struck down a law prohibiting the registration and possession of firearms. The case dealt with the interpretation of the Second Amendment and its application to individual gun - ownership rights in the District of Columbia.

Answer:

B. struck down a law prohibiting the registration and possession of firearms.