Question

question 4 of 10
which option best completes the diagram?
a teen who
publishes a
website making
fun of a movie
actor is sued by
the actors
lawyers.
?
a judge agrees
and rules that
the website is
protected
speech.
a. the teen argues that the actor is a public figure.
b. the actor argues that the website is broadcast speech.
c. the actor argues that the website is libel.
d. the teen argues that speech by juveniles is always protected.

Explanation:

In legal cases involving speech about public figures, the standard for proving libel is much higher (requiring actual malice) than for private individuals. If the teen argues the actor is a public figure, this aligns with the judge ruling the website is protected speech, as parody/commentary about public figures is often protected under free speech principles. The other options do not logically lead to the judge's ruling: claiming the speech is broadcast (B) does not support protection, the actor arguing libel (C) would be the opposing position, and the claim that juvenile speech is always protected (D) is an incorrect legal standard.

Answer:

A. The teen argues that the actor is a public figure.