Question

question 38
2 pts
which of the following is not part of treuers argument that national parks should be turned over to tribes?
○ tribes have the experience and leadership models necessary to deal with complex bureaucratic issues raised by the national parks
○ national parks are suffering from overcrowding and improper use, so only indigenous peoples should be able to access and manage those lands while ecological health is restored
○ returning national parks to tribes would restore dignity and rightful access to traditional homelands
○ returning national parks to tribes would bring fresh innovation to matters of land conservation and development

Explanation:

Treuer's argument for turning over National Parks to tribes centers on Indigenous stewardship expertise, restoring tribal rights, and innovative conservation. The claim that only Indigenous peoples should access the lands during restoration is not part of his argument; his focus is on tribal management, not excluding all others entirely. The other options align with his points about tribal bureaucratic capacity, dignity/land access, and conservation innovation.

Answer:

National Parks are suffering from overcrowding and improper use, so only Indigenous peoples should be able to access and manage those lands while ecological health is restored