Question

read the excerpt from \for the era.\
there are objections raised to wiping out laws protecting women workers. no one would condone exploitation. but what does sex have to do with it?
which question best summarizes what chisholm means?
○ why do we need laws that condone exploitation of women, but not men?
○ why shouldnt all workers be protected from exploitation, regardless of sex?
○ which objections to protecting women would be raised about protecting men?
○ what does sex have to do with raising objections to the exploitation of women?

Explanation:

Chisholm's point is that exploitation of workers is unacceptable, and she questions why sex is a factor in protective laws. She implies protection should apply to all workers, not just women. The correct option aligns with this core idea by framing the question around universal worker protection regardless of sex, matching her critical tone about gendered protective laws.

Answer:

B. Why shouldn't all workers be protected from exploitation, regardless of sex?