Question

read the excerpt from parvatis argument in favor of using cell phones in class. todays cell phones are not just phones; they are little computers. that means they are effective research tools. students can use them to access dictionaries, encyclopedias, and other reference materials. they can search for articles, videos, and images. in my civics class, our teacher even held mock elections, and we voted using our cell phones. what is the best evaluation of parvatis evidence? it is irrelevant and insufficient, because she discusses using computers rather than phones it is irrelevant and insufficient, because her evidence relies solely on her own experience. it is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork. it is relevant and insufficient, because she provides general reasons without specific examples.

Explanation:

Parvati's evidence is relevant because it directly relates to using cell phones as academic tools in class. However, it is insufficient: she only gives one specific personal example (mock elections) plus general uses, which is not enough robust, widespread evidence to fully support her argument. The other options are incorrect: her evidence is not irrelevant, she does not rely solely on her own experience (she lists general research uses), and it is not sufficient as her examples are limited.

Answer:

It is relevant and insufficient, because she provides general reasons without specific examples.