Question

read horuss evaluation of an argument that claims that everyone should remain on daylight saving time all year long. in her editorial today, smith returns to the perennial issue of setting our clocks back as we return to standard time. her reasons are compelling. not only would it be more convenient if we didnt have to change our clocks twice a year, but it would prevent the confusion that results from states and countries in different time zones changing their clocks on different dates. smiths evidence is drawn from amusing commonplace experiences, such as arriving at church as the service is ending, and from pragmatic—sometimes serious—concerns about global business and communication, such as statistics on the economic impact of time mix - ups. what should horus add to his evaluation to make it more effective? select two options. a statement summarizing smiths claim examples of smiths reasoning and evidence an evaluation of smiths reasoning and evidence a sentence introducing the topic of the argument a conclusion summarizing the claim and evaluation

Explanation:

To make an evaluation of an argument more effective, one should analyze the reasoning and evidence used in the argument. Also, a conclusion that sums up the claim and the evaluation provides a clear - cut end to the analysis. Summarizing the claim is already somewhat done, introducing the topic is not the most crucial for a strong evaluation, and just listing examples without evaluation is not sufficient.

Answer:

C. an evaluation of Smith's reasoning and evidence
E. a conclusion summarizing the claim and evaluation