Question

read this passage from elie wiesels the perils of indifference: does it mean that we have learned from the past? does it mean that society has changed? has the human being become less indifferent and more human? have we really learned from our experiences? are we less insensitive to the plight of victims of ethnic cleansing and other forms of injustices in places near and far? is todays justified intervention in kosovo, led by you, mr. president, a lasting warning that never again will the deportation, the terrorization of children and their parents, be allowed anywhere in the world? will it discourage other dictators in other lands to do the same? why does wiesel end his speech with several questions? a. to leave unanswered questions for the audience to think about b. to directly state his opinion c. to provide a strong, religious plea for help d. to provide the audience with a warm, comfortable feeling at the end of the speech

Explanation:

Wiesel uses rhetorical questions at the end to prompt reflection. He doesn't directly state his opinion, make a religious plea, or aim for a warm - comfortable feeling. He wants the audience to consider important issues related to human behavior and justice.

Answer:

A. To leave unanswered questions for the audience to think about