Question

read a text about interspecies friendships.
when zoo staff placed a goat into a tigers enclosure, it was to serve as the big cats food. although the tiger, amur, had preyed on plenty of goats in the past, he let this goat, timur, live. the animals resulting relationship warmed hearts across the globe. yet this sentimentality was likely misplaced. after all, goats are still the natural prey of tigers. amurs refusal to hunt timur was instead a result of his human - designed habitat. since food is plentiful in zoos, unlike in the wild, the absence of his natural hunting instinct is neither shocking nor particularly remarkable. and timur and amurs relationship didnt even last very long: timur was relocated after a violent encounter with his tiger \friend.\
select all the details that are included in the text:

detail	text 1
typically, tigers view goats as a food source.
zoo habitats tend to lessen animals predatory instincts.
amur let timur live, although timur was meant to be his meal.

Explanation:

1. For "In the end, Timur and Amur were separated after a fight.": The text states Timur was relocated after a violent encounter with Amur, so this matches.
2. For "Typically, tigers view goats as a food source.": The text notes goats are the natural prey of tigers, and Amur had preyed on goats before, confirming this.
3. For "Zoo habitats tend to lessen animals' predatory instincts.": The text explains that because zoo food is plentiful, Amur's lack of hunting instinct is unremarkable, meaning zoo habitats reduce these instincts.
4. For "Amur let Timur live, although Timur was meant to be his meal.": The text says the goat was placed in the enclosure as food, but Amur let Timur live, so this matches.

Answer:

• In the end, Timur and Amur were separated after a fight.
• Typically, tigers view goats as a food source.
• Zoo habitats tend to lessen animals' predatory instincts.
• Amur let Timur live, although Timur was meant to be his meal.