Question

read the two passages
passage 1
the need for standardized testing in education is a sensitive topic to some. many fear that the use of these tests with students of all ages would lead to a decline in both academic growth and innovation; however, if standardized testing continues to be a reliable and objective source of measuring student achievement, we must conclude that the means justify the end. we can simply state the results of a 100 - year analysis of testing research for proof: 93 percent of studies on student testing found a favorable outcome for student achievement
passage 2
when the brookings institution, a 100 - year - old organization made up of experts in education and government, reports that up to 80 percent of standardized test score improvements were temporary and did not lead to improvements in learning, we must realize that student testing is not working. i have visited several schools during testing time, so i can personally vouch for the negative effect that standardized tests have on students emotions. standardized testing is unnecessary and must end
how does the evidence in the first passage differ from the evidence in the second?
passage 1 uses anecdotal evidence, while passage 2 uses empirical evidence
passage 1 uses anecdotal evidence while passage 2 uses logical evidence
passage 1 uses logical evidence, while passage 2 uses logical and anecdotal evidence
passage 1 uses empirical evidence while passage 2 uses logical evidence

Explanation:

Passage 1 uses data from a 100 - year analysis (empirical evidence) about student testing research. Passage 2 uses a report from an expert - organization (empirical to some extent but also logical in its conclusion) and personal experience (anecdotal evidence) of visiting schools.

Answer:

Passage 1 uses empirical evidence, while passage 2 uses logical and anecdotal evidence.