Question

read the two passages from sugar changed the world. knowing that their slaves were likely to die by the time they reached their thirties, louisiana sugar planters were extremely selective—they bought only healthy - looking young men in their late teens. on average, the men purchased in louisiana were an inch taller than the people bought in the other slave states. those teenagers made up seven to eight out of every ten slaves brought to americas sugar hell. the others were younger teenage girls, around fifteen to sixteen years old. their job, for the rest of their short lives, was to have children. elizabeth ross hite knew that, for sure, “all de master wanted was to dem women to hav children.” enslaved children would be put to work or sold. the overseer s.b. raby explained, “rachel had a fine boy last sunday. our crop of negroes will i think make up any deficiencies there may be in the cane crop.” that is, a master could sell any slaves who managed to live if he needed more. which statement best explains how the authors develop their claim across the two passages? both passages share historical details to support the claim that the lives of sugarcane workers in different countries were essentially the same. both passages use facts and details to support the claim that sugar workers in different places used music to express themselves and relieve the pressures of brutal work. both passages use facts and details to support the claim that sugarcane was the most powerful economic force throughout the world. both passages include historical details to support the claim that songs allowed owners to recognize the importance of enslaved peoples cultures.

Explanation:

The passage focuses on the harsh lives of sugar - cane workers and slaves in Louisiana, using historical details like the age and selection of slaves, and their forced roles. These details support the idea that the lives of sugarcane workers in different countries were essentially the same in terms of the harsh treatment they endured.

Answer:

Both passages share historical details to support the claim that the lives of sugarcane workers in different countries were essentially the same.