Question

select the best evidence to support the statement that roman soldiers werent always paid with money.

the roman army maintained a system of forts to monitor traffic in and out of the conquered territories that made up the empire.

a roman fort contained everything that was needed to keep the soldiers healthy, well - trained, and properly equipped.

traders, artisans, and soldiers slaves and families followed the roman army as it traveled. permanent forts had a vicus, or civilian settlement, where soldiers could spend their money. roman soldiers were paid. in early times they might have been provided with salt, which was a valuable commodity. the word salary comes from sal, the latin word for \salt.\ the word soldier, in turn, comes from an old french word for \salary.\

from dyan blacklock, the roman army: the legendary soldiers who created an empire. copyright 2004 by walker books for young readers

Explanation:

To support the statement that Roman soldiers weren't always paid with money, we look for evidence of non - monetary payment. The relevant part is "In early times they might have been provided with salt, which was a valuable commodity. The word salary comes from sal, the Latin word for'salt.' The word soldier, in turn, comes from an old French word for'salary'." This shows that in early times, they were paid with salt (a non - monetary commodity) instead of money. The other statements are about the Roman Army's fort system and the civilian settlements following the army, which are not related to the payment method of soldiers.

Answer:

In early times they might have been provided with salt, which was a valuable commodity. The word salary comes from sal, the Latin word for "salt." The word soldier, in turn, comes from an old French word for "salary."