Question

if serbia had used the term \murder\ rather than \ethnic cleansing\ to describe its actions against muslims, it is likely that they would have
proceeded in exactly the same way.
won more civilian support for their actions.
felt too guilty to continue with their plans.
achieved their goals more quickly.

Explanation:

The term "ethnic cleansing" is a euphemism that downplays the violent and immoral nature of the actions, while "murder" is a direct and morally condemnatory term. Using "murder" would likely make the perpetrators confront the moral gravity of their actions, leading to feelings of guilt that might stop them from continuing. The other options are incorrect: using a more condemnatory term wouldn't win more support, speed up goals, or lead to the same actions as the moral weight of "murder" would impact their resolve.

Answer:

C. felt too guilty to continue with their plans.