Question

though the outcomes of tinker and schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in common? they agreed that political expression could be restricted. they agreed that libel was not protected speech. they agreed that symbolic speech could be protected. they agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.

Explanation:

In the Tinker v. Des Moines case, symbolic speech (wearing armbands to protest the Vietnam - war) was protected to an extent, while in Schenck v. United States, the Court held that speech could be restricted when it presented a "clear and present danger" to public safety. Both cases show that speech rights are not absolute and can be limited to protect safety.

Answer:

They agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.