Question

under the free exercise clause, there must be a compelling state interest to withhold unemployment benefits
roe v. wade
miranda v. arizona
tinker v. des moines
sherbert v. verner

Explanation:

• Roe v. Wade centered on abortion rights and privacy.
• Miranda v. Arizona established Miranda rights for criminal suspects.
• Tinker v. Des Moines focused on student free speech in schools.
• Sherbert v. Verner held that a state must show a compelling interest to deny unemployment benefits to someone who was fired for refusing work on their religious Sabbath, directly relating to the Free Exercise Clause and unemployment benefits.

Answer:

D. Sherbert v. Verner