Question

what criteria are you likely to use when evaluating someones argument? check any that apply. whether the argument shows a lack of obvious bias whether the author includes facts that support the argument whether the arguments structure is easy to follow whether the argument uses stories that make an emotional connection whether the argument acknowledges opposing arguments

Explanation:

• Lack of bias ensures objectivity.
• Supporting facts add credibility.
• Easy - to - follow structure aids comprehension.
• Emotional stories can enhance persuasiveness.
• Acknowledging opposing arguments shows comprehensiveness.

Answer:

All of the above options are valid criteria for evaluating an argument. So,

• whether the argument shows a lack of obvious bias
• whether the author includes facts that support the argument
• whether the argument's structure is easy to follow
• whether the argument uses stories that make an emotional connection
• whether the argument acknowledges opposing arguments