Question

what was the federalists argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the constitution? it might be used later to limit rights that werent originally listed it was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms it was unnecessary because the new government had limited power it might be used later to free enslaved people in the west

Explanation:

The Federalists argued that a separate bill of rights was unnecessary as the new government had limited power. They also worried that listing specific rights might imply that other rights were not protected, and that a bill of rights could potentially be used to limit rights not originally listed.

Answer:

It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed; It was unnecessary because the new government had limited power