Question

which is the best claim for an argumentative essay that supports the sale of unlabeled genetically modified food?
○ food companies that label genetically modified food are behaving unethically by needlessly alarming consumers.
○ there are food companies that sell genetically modified food without including a label that identifies it as such.
○ it is ethical for food companies to sell unlabeled genetically modified food because customers can become confused if there are too many labels.

Explanation:

To determine the best claim for an argumentative essay supporting unlabeled GMO food sales, we analyze each option:

• The first option criticizes labeling (opposing the "support" goal, as it focuses on labeling as unethical, not supporting unlabeled sales directly).
• The second option is a factual statement (not an argumentative claim with a stance).
• The third option explicitly states it is ethical to sell unlabeled GMO food and provides a reason (customer confusion from too many labels), making it a clear, supportive argumentative claim.

Answer:

C. It is ethical for food companies to sell unlabeled genetically modified food because customers can become confused if there are too many labels.