Question

which best describes one main difference between rachel carsons silent spring and winona ladukes a certain justice? carson is concerned about the destruction of the entire environment, while laduke is only concerned about a certain part of the environment. carson speaks of a possible future, while laduke discusses only what has happened in the past. carson believes that the past was just as bad as the present, while laduke believes that the present is worse than the past. carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while laduke appeals to readers emotions.

Explanation:

Rachel Carson en "Silent Spring" presenta hechos y evidencia para sostener su argumento ambiental. Winona LaDuke, en cambio, parece recurrir a emociones para transmitir su mensaje. Carson se basa en la ciencia y la evidencia, mientras que LaDuke busca conmover a los lectores emocionalmente.

Answer:

Carson offers facts and evidence to support her argument, while LaDuke appeals to readers' emotions.