Question

which evidence supports the point that off - leash dogs with their owners are safer than dogs on leashes? add it to the chart.
point
off - leash dogs are safer to be around than leashed dogs.
detail
dogs on leashes may attack because they cant run from danger.
detail
?
dog bites in new york city have gone down since off - leash laws were passed.
experts say that off - leash dogs are usually friendly around other dogs and people.
reports show that off - leash dogs do not need to protect their food.

Explanation:

To support the point that off - leash dogs with their owners are safer than leashed dogs, we need evidence that directly relates to the safety of off - leash dogs.

• "Dog bites in New York City have gone down since off - leash laws were passed" shows a positive safety outcome associated with off - leash dogs.
• "Experts say that off - leash dogs are usually friendly around other dogs and people" directly states that off - leash dogs are safe (friendly) around others.
• "Reports show that off - leash dogs do not need to protect their food" is not directly related to the safety of off - leash dogs compared to leashed dogs.

Among these, "Dog bites in New York City have gone down since off - leash laws were passed" and "Experts say that off - leash dogs are usually friendly around other dogs and people" are relevant. But "Dog bites in New York City have gone down since off - leash laws were passed" provides a real - world statistical evidence of increased safety with off - leash dogs, which is a strong support.

Answer:

The evidence that supports the point is: Dog bites in New York City have gone down since off - leash laws were passed. (Another valid one is "Experts say that off - leash dogs are usually friendly around other dogs and people", but the first one is a more empirical evidence of safety improvement.)