Question

which statement best explains the result of a peer - reviewed conclusion?
if the peers reject the conclusion, it must be retested and changed.
peers will accept the conclusion if it doesnt fit their opinions.
it is accepted once a scientific journal publishes it.
if peers reject the conclusion, it is probably out of jealously.

Explanation:

Peer - review is a process in which experts in the field evaluate research. If peers reject a conclusion, it indicates potential flaws, and the research should be retested and adjusted. Peers don't accept conclusions that don't fit their opinions. Publication in a journal doesn't guarantee acceptance. Rejection is not due to jealousy but likely due to scientific concerns.

Answer:

If the peers reject the conclusion, it must be retested and changed.