Question

which statement would be an effective conclusion for the evaluation of an article on the potential threat of technology?
○ finally, wilson’s article argues that technology is detrimental to learning because fewer students are reading for pleasure.
○ i agree with wilson’s argument. when i stopped watching videos on my phone, my grades went up, so technology must make it more difficult to learn.
○ wilson’s article states that computers, tablets, and smartphones should not be allowed in the classroom because these devices distract students.
○ therefore, wilson’s argument that technology makes it more difficult for students to concentrate is thoroughly researched and provides ample supporting evidence.

Explanation:

To determine an effective conclusion for evaluating an article on technology's threat, we analyze each option:

• The first option just restates the article's argument, not evaluating it.
• The second uses a personal anecdote, which is not a thorough evaluation.
• The third restates a claim from the article, not evaluating the argument's strength.
• The fourth option evaluates Wilson’s argument by stating it is thoroughly researched and has ample evidence, which is what a conclusion for an evaluation should do (assess the argument’s validity and support).

Answer:

D. Therefore, Wilson’s argument that technology makes it more difficult for students to concentrate is thoroughly researched and provides ample supporting evidence.