Question

you have an unverified email address. please open settings to verify your communication details.
checkpoint 1.2
earth science a (is704f) #97471 / week 3 / lesson 6b: checkpoint 1.2

1. why is the big crunch a hypothesis and not a theory like the big bang?

the big crunch is based on the idea that the universe has been shrinking since day one. the idea cannot be a th
the big crunch is based on data and measured evidence, and the big bang is based on an educated guess.
the big crunch is a new idea and has not been around as long as the big bang theory. in order for a hypothesis to
in contrast to the big bang theory, the big crunch does not have enough data and evidence to support it.

Explanation:

To determine the correct answer, we analyze the definitions of hypothesis and theory. A theory is well - supported by evidence, while a hypothesis is a proposed explanation with less evidence.

• The first option is incorrect as the Big Crunch idea is about the universe potentially collapsing in the future, not shrinking since the start.
• The second option is wrong because the Big Bang is a theory with substantial evidence, and the Big Crunch is a hypothesis with less evidence.
• The third option is incorrect as the distinction between hypothesis and theory is not based on the age of the idea.
• The fourth option is correct. The Big Bang is a theory with a large amount of supporting data and evidence. The Big Crunch, however, lacks sufficient data and evidence to be elevated to the status of a theory, so it remains a hypothesis.

Answer:

The correct option is: "In contrast to the Big Bang theory, the Big Crunch does not have enough data and evidence to support it." (The option with this text, assuming it's the fourth option in the list of radio buttons)