Question

1. is the introduction formal or informal? explain using 2 reasons

answer the following in french...

1. quel age a hiro?
2. quelle est sa nationalité ?
3. quelles langues parle hiro?
4. ou habite hiro?
5. les adjectifs pour décrire hiro sont...
6. quels sont ses sports préférés?
7. decrire sa famille.

Explanation:

Question 2: Quel âge a Hiro?

To answer "Quel âge a Hiro?", we use the information provided (the handwritten "16"). In French, we say "Hiro a seize ans" to state someone's age.

Assuming common context (since no prior text is fully visible, but if we infer typical setups, maybe Japanese - Australian? Wait, but since the answer needs to be in French. Wait, maybe from context, if Hiro lives in Sydney, maybe Australian? Or Japanese? Wait, the problem has handwritten notes but for question 3, we need to form the answer. Let's assume, for example, if Hiro is Japanese - Australian, but maybe the intended answer is "Sa nationalité est japonaise" or "australienne". Wait, but since the original has no full context, but let's proceed with a standard response. Let's say, for example, if we take a common name Hiro, often Japanese origin. So "Sa nationalité est japonaise." Or if in Sydney, maybe "australienne". But since the problem is to answer in French, we structure it as "Sa nationalité est [nationality]". Let's assume, for the sake of example, "Sa nationalité est japonaise." (If the intended is Japanese) or "australienne" (if Australian). But since the handwritten notes don't specify, but let's provide a correct French structure.

To answer "Quelles langues parle Hiro?", we need to state the languages. Assuming common contexts (e.g., if in Sydney, maybe English, Japanese, French? Or English and Japanese). In French, we list the languages. For example, "Hiro parle le japonais et l'anglais." (if those are the languages).

Answer:

Hiro a seize ans.

Question 3: Quelle est sa nationalité?