Question

the primary difference between the allocation strategies of force and command is

• force is always done in a non - voluntary way whereas command may be done by an elected entity or as an agreement (like a mediator).
• force doesnt happen in real life and command does.
• force is never used by government agencies and command is always used by government agencies.
• force involves a buyer and a seller whereas command is usually only used on the buyer side.

Explanation:

• Analyze the first option: Force is non - voluntary (e.g., coercion), while command can come from an elected entity (like a government) or as an agreement (mediator - led). This aligns with the concepts of force (involuntary) and command (can be voluntary or from legitimate authority).
• The second option is wrong because force does happen in real life (e.g., theft, coercion).
• The third option is wrong as government agencies can use force (e.g., law enforcement using force to uphold laws) and command isn't always used by them in an absolute sense.
• The fourth option is wrong as force doesn't necessarily involve a buyer - seller relationship, and command's relation to buyer - seller is misrepresented.

Answer:

A. force is always done in a non - voluntary way whereas command may be done by an elected entity or as an agreement (like a mediator).