Question

protections and limitations over time
how has supreme court precedent changed your fifth amendment rights over time? check all that apply.
officers can pressure a person to confess to a crime.
officers must communicate a persons rights to before questioning the person in custody.
officers can question someone immediately if public safety is at risk.
officers can communicate a persons rights in their own words if they communicate the same meaning.
officers may create different sets of rules to apply to groups of citizens however they please.

Explanation:

The Fifth Amendment includes the right against self - incrimination. Supreme Court precedent has led to the requirement that officers must inform a person in custody of their rights (Miranda rights) before questioning. However, if public safety is at risk, officers can question immediately. Also, they can communicate rights in their own words as long as the meaning is the same. Pressuring a person to confess is against the Fifth Amendment, and officers cannot create different sets of rules for groups of citizens as they please.

Answer:

B. Officers must communicate a person's rights to before questioning the person in custody.
C. Officers can question someone immediately if public safety is at risk.
D. Officers can communicate a person's rights in their own words if they communicate the same meaning.