Question

question 8 (multiple choice worth 2 points) (04.04r mc) jamar is writing an argumentative essay on whether or not public libraries should provide more digital books and resources. the counterclaim argues that \traditional printed books are more reliable and have a longer lifespan.\ which of the following is an effective rebuttal to this counterclaim? digital books are more expensive for libraries to acquire than printed books. digital resources are more accessible to a broader audience, including people with disabilities. libraries should prioritize physical books and limit access to digital resources. nobody even goes to libraries anymore anyways, so what does it matter?

Explanation:

To find an effective rebuttal, we need a statement that supports providing more digital books/resources by highlighting their benefits. Let's analyze each option:

• Option 1: Claims digital books are more expensive, which would support the counterclaim (against digital resources), so not a rebuttal.
• Option 2: States digital resources are more accessible (including to people with disabilities), showing a benefit of digital resources and thus rebutting the counterclaim that printed books are more reliable (by emphasizing digital's accessibility advantage).
• Option 3: Suggests limiting digital resources, which is against the argument for more digital resources, not a rebuttal.
• Option 4: Is a dismissive statement and doesn't address the reliability or value of digital vs. printed books, so not a valid rebuttal.

Answer:

B. Digital resources are more accessible to a broader audience, including people with disabilities