Question

question 5 (2.5 points)
what is the difference between aspirational ethics and mandatory ethics?
aspirational ethics are legally enforceable, while mandatory ethics are not.
aspirational ethics are set by professional organizations, while mandatory ethics
are set by the government.
aspirational ethics are concerned with legal issues, while mandatory ethics are
concerned with ethical issues.
aspirational ethics describe the highest standards of thinking and conduct, while
mandatory ethics describe the minimum standards.
question 6 (2.5 points)
which of the following helps practitioners expand their awareness and clarify their
values in dealing with the challenges of their work?
years of experience

Explanation:

Question 5

• Analyze each option:
• Option 1: Mandatory ethics (like laws/regulations) are legally enforceable, aspirational are not. So this is wrong.
• Option 2: Both can be set by professional orgs/government. This distinction is incorrect.
• Option 3: Mandatory ethics (e.g., legal requirements) are about legal issues, aspirational about ethical ideals. This swaps them, so wrong.
• Option 4: Aspirational ethics represent the highest ethical standards one should strive for, while mandatory ethics are the minimum (e.g., legal or professional requirements one must meet). This matches the definitions.

Answer:

D. Aspirational ethics describe the highest standards of thinking and conduct, while mandatory ethics describe the minimum standards.

Question 6

Since the options are cut off, please provide the full list of options for Question 6 so that I can assist you further.