Question

read the excerpt from \for the era.\
it is obvious, i think, that a robust woman could be
more fit for physical labor than a weak man. the choice
of occupation would be determined by individual
capabilities, and the rewards for equal work should be
equal.
which best summarizes the excerpts main ideas?
isnt it obvious that some women are stronger and
more fit for certain jobs than some smaller, weaker
men, and thus they should be paid the same
amount?
fitness for a particular occupation should be
determined by individual capabilities, and pay should
be equal regardless of sex.
women who are more capable than men for certain
jobs should be given the opportunity to train for
those jobs and should be paid the same as men are.
both sexes can develop physical characteristics that
make them fit for physical labor, and everyone
deserves fair pay for a good days work.

Explanation:

The excerpt makes two key points: 1) Occupation suitability should be based on individual abilities, using the example of a strong woman vs. a weak man. 2) Equal work should receive equal rewards. The correct option distills both core ideas without adding extra, unmentioned details like training opportunities or overgeneralizing physical characteristics.

Answer:

Fitness for a particular occupation should be determined by individual capabilities, and pay should be equal regardless of sex.