Question

select the correct answer from each drop - down menu.
marjory works at a commercial bakery. she is conducting an experiment to test the results of two yeast activators for making bread. the rapid prove activator claims to increase the rise of dough by at least 30%. the quick rise activator claims to increase the rise of dough by at least 26%.
marjory and her team bake 60 loaves of bread, 30 using the rapid prove activator and 30 using the quick rise activator.
after the loaves were baked, marjory evaluated the rise of the breads as compared to previous doughs with no activator used. she reported that, on average, the rise of those made with the rapid prove activator increased by 25% and the rise of loaves made with the quick rise activator increased by 28%.
the rapid prove activator claim is
the quick rise activator claim is
the activator is more effective because the increase in rise was that of the other activator.
reset
next

Explanation:

Step1: Analyze Rapid Prove's claim

The Rapid Prove activator claims a 30% increase. Its actual average increase is 25%, which is less than 30%, so its claim is false.

Step2: Analyze Quick Rise's claim

The Quick Rise activator claims a 26% increase. Its actual average increase is 28%, which is more than 26%, so its claim is true.

Step3: Compare effectiveness

The Quick Rise activator's increase (28%) is more than Rapid Prove's (25%), so Quick Rise is more effective. The increase difference: 28% - 25% = 3% (or we can say "greater" as a comparison term for the last blank).

Answer:

The Rapid Prove activator claim is \boxed{false}.
The Quick Rise activator claim is \boxed{true}.
The \boxed{Quick Rise} activator is more effective because the increase in rise was \boxed{greater} than that of the other activator.