Question

in tinker v. des moines, why did the supreme court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? their action did not negatively influence other students. their action was not disruptive. their action occurred off school grounds. their action was political speech.

Explanation:

In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme - Court ruled in favor of the students because their wearing of armbands was a form of symbolic speech that was not disruptive to the school environment. The Court held that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."

Answer:

Their action was not disruptive.