Question

what should a scientist conclude when experimental results do support their hypothesis? the hypothesis is most likely true. the experiment was deeply flawed. the statistical analysis was biased. no further experiments are necessary.

Explanation:

In scientific method, when experimental results support a hypothesis, the conclusion is that the hypothesis is likely true. The other options are incorrect: a supported hypothesis doesn't imply the experiment is flawed (option 2), statistical analysis being biased (option 3) is not indicated by support, and further experiments are still good for replication/validation (option 4 is wrong).

Answer:

The hypothesis is most likely true.