Question

when you are writing a position paper, should you include a discussion of viewpoints that differ from the position you are taking?

○ yes; including other possible viewpoints in your position paper is good because it shows that there are other possible positions on the issue.

○ no; including other possible viewpoints in your position paper is not good because then your readers might choose to believe in one of those opposing viewpoints rather than your position.

○ yes; including other possible viewpoints in your position paper makes your paper stronger because it shows that you have fully considered the issue and that you understand and respect its complexity.

○ no; including other possible viewpoints in your position paper will alienate readers who agree with your position on the issue.

Explanation:

Including opposing viewpoints in a position paper strengthens the argument by demonstrating that the writer has thoroughly analyzed the issue, acknowledges its complexity, and can address counterarguments, which builds credibility with the audience. The other yes option only states that other positions exist, which is not the key reason, while the no options incorrectly assume opposing viewpoints will undermine the writer's position or alienate supporters.

Answer:

Yes; including other possible viewpoints in your position paper makes your paper stronger because it shows that you have fully considered the issue and that you understand and respect its complexity.