Question

which comparison best explains how the authors develop their claims in \the automation paradox\ and \heads up, humans\? in \the automation paradox\ bessen primarily uses anecdotes to show how computers have reduced the workforce. in \heads up, humans,\ alarcón primarily uses graphs and charts to show how computers have benefited workers. in \the automation paradox\ bessen primarily uses graphs and charts to show how computers have not changed employment levels. in \heads up, humans,\ alarcón primarily uses opinions to show how computers have harmed workers. in \the automation paradox\ bessen primarily uses statistics to show how computers have increased blue - collar jobs. in \heads up, humans,\ alarcón primarily uses anecdotes to show how computers have lowered low - skill employment in many professions. in \the automation paradox\ bessen primarily uses examples to show how computers have improved the workplace. in \heads up, humans,\ alarcón primarily uses statistics to show how computers have increased unemployment in many professions.

Explanation:

To answer this, one needs to understand the main - argument development techniques in the two given texts. By analyzing the use of anecdotes, graphs, charts, opinions, statistics, and examples in each text, we can determine the best comparison. In "The Automation Paradox", anecdotes are used to show computer - related workforce changes, and in "Heads Up, Humans", graphs and charts are used to show computer - related worker benefits.

Answer:

A. In "The Automation Paradox," Bessen primarily uses anecdotes to show how computers have reduced the workforce. In "Heads Up, Humans," Alarcón primarily uses graphs and charts to show how computers have benefited workers.