Question

which of these best describes the purpose for \hands - only\ cpr?
a hands - only cpr is better and more effective than full cpr and is now the best way to provide cpr for any patient by any responder
b hands - only cpr reduces risk of liability and increases oxygenation better than cpr with mouth - to - mouth resuscitation
c hands - only cpr is now the only method for providing cpr regardless your level of education and expertise
d hands - only cpr was designed for those who are not trained or feel uncomfortable delivering mouth - to - mouth breaths. it doesnt replace traditional cpr.

Explanation:

• Option A is incorrect because hands - only CPR is not better and more effective than full CPR in all cases, and it's not the best way for every patient and responder.
• Option B is incorrect as there's no evidence that hands - only CPR reduces liability or is better at oxygenation than CPR with mouth - to - mouth.
• Option C is incorrect because hands - only CPR is not the only method; traditional CPR with mouth - to - mouth is still used in appropriate situations.
• Option D is correct as hands - only CPR is intended for those untrained or uncomfortable with mouth - to - mouth and doesn't replace traditional CPR.

Answer:

D. Hands - only CPR was designed for those who are not trained or feel uncomfortable delivering mouth - to - mouth breaths. It doesn't replace traditional CPR.