Question

which of these is a reason that renewable resources are considered more sustainable than non - renewable resources? renewable resources are not used as frequently as non - renewable ones. renewable resources can be replenished by a number of natural processes. renewable resources are always going to be cheaper than non - renwable resources.

Explanation:

• Analyze the first option: The frequency of use is not the defining factor for sustainability. Renewable resources can be used frequently if they are replenished, so this is incorrect.
• Analyze the second option: Sustainability in terms of resources is related to the ability to be renewed or replenished. Renewable resources (like solar, wind, water, biomass) are replenished by natural processes (e.g., water cycle, photosynthesis for biomass), which makes them sustainable as they don't get exhausted like non - renewable (fossil fuels, minerals) which take millions of years to form and are finite.
• Analyze the third option: The cost of renewable resources is not always lower. In some cases, initial setup costs (like solar panels, wind turbines) can be high, and cost also depends on technology, location, etc. So this statement is false.

Answer:

B. Renewable resources can be replenished by a number of natural processes.