Question

1. why might some countries have objected to the way the united states obtained the panama canal zone?

Explanation:

The U.S. backed a Panamanian secession from Colombia in 1903, using military pressure to ensure Panama's independence. Immediately after, the U.S. signed a treaty with the new Panamanian government that gave it permanent control over a 10-mile wide Canal Zone, effectively treating the zone as U.S. territory rather than a leased area. This process was seen as an act of interventionism and disregard for the sovereignty of Colombia, and later Panama, by other nations, as it prioritized U.S. strategic and economic interests over the self-determination of Latin American states.

Answer:

Some countries objected because the U.S. used military-backed intervention to help Panama secede from Colombia, then secured permanent control over the Panama Canal Zone through a treaty with the new, U.S.-favored Panamanian government. This was viewed as a violation of Colombian sovereignty and an example of imperialist overreach that ignored the self-determination of Latin American nations.