Question

the author of “american flag stands for tolerance” presents an opposing claim in paragraph 5. how does he rebut this opposing claim in paragraph 6? he maintains that the objection to his claim is untrue because the principle he upholds is not dogmatic. he argues that the requirement to reject dogma is limited to rejecting one particular principle, not all dogma. he admits that the objection to his claim is true, but states that the dogma he supports is more reasonable than what it replaces. he points out that the idea of limiting freedom of expression to protect the flag is a belief of private citizens, but should be official dogma.

Explanation:

To answer this, one needs to analyze the content of paragraph 6 to see how the author counters the opposing claim in paragraph 5. By examining the options, we look for the one that accurately represents the author's argumentative strategy in that paragraph. The author maintains that the principle he upholds is not dogmatic, thus refuting the opposing claim.

Answer:

He maintains that the objection to his claim is untrue because the principle he upholds is not dogmatic.