Question

elaborating with an explanation
should there be term limits on the members of
congress? the president has a two - term limit, but some
members of congress have spent years in their position.
some people argue that congress should also have a
two - term limit. some members of the house of
representatives and the senate have spent their entire
careers in congress. the term lengths of senators and
representatives do differ, so one group spends more time
in office than the other.
which concepts should be explained in this paragraph?
check all that apply.
☐ presidents who served more than two terms
☐ the minimum age of a congressperson
☐ the term length for senators
☐ the process for voting as a member of congress
☐ the term length for members of the house

Explanation:

To determine which concepts should be explained, we analyze the paragraph:

• The paragraph compares the president's two - term limit to Congress members' terms. It also mentions that senators and representatives have different term lengths.
• "Presidents who served more than two terms": The paragraph only mentions the president's two - term limit, not those who served more, so this is not relevant.
• "The minimum age of a congressperson": The paragraph does not discuss the age of congresspersons, so this is not relevant.
• "The term length for senators": The paragraph states that the term lengths of senators and representatives differ, so this concept is relevant and should be explained.
• "The process for voting as a member of Congress": The paragraph does not talk about the voting process of Congress members, so this is not relevant.
• "The term length for members of the House": Since the paragraph mentions the difference in term lengths between senators and representatives (House members), this concept is relevant and should be explained.

Answer:

• the term length for senators
• the term length for members of the House