Question

a store clerk checks a persons i.d. before selling an item, recognizes that he/she is from another state, and charges an extra tax on the item. what is the likely outcome of the court when he/she beings a legal action?

none of these

the extra tax discriminates, therefore violating the commerce clause.

the extra tax is unduly burdensome, therefore the violating the commerce clause.

the extra tax does not violate the commerce clause because a state or local government may regulate local aspect of interstate commerce.

Explanation:

The Commerce Clause prohibits states from imposing discriminatory taxes on out-of-state individuals in a way that burdens interstate commerce. Charging an extra tax solely based on a person being from another state is explicit discrimination against interstate commerce, which violates this clause. The option about being unduly burdensome is incorrect because the core issue here is discrimination, not excessive burden, and the final option is wrong as this is not a permissible local regulation of interstate commerce.

Answer:

The extra tax discriminates, therefore violating the commerce clause.