Question

use two of the pieces below to build a strong opposing argument. thesis colleges should require all new students to choose an area of study before applying. opposing argument your answer critics argue that sentence menu - drag up two of the segments. no student would go to college if required to choose a major ahead of time. teenagers dont have any way of knowing what jobs they will want as adults, so they wouldnt attend college if they had to decide their career tracks before applying. students wont know what they want to major in until they have taken a variety of classes. some college students change their minds about what they want to study several times during their first and second years.

Explanation:

To build a strong opposing argument, select two logically connected segments that address the flaw in requiring new students to choose a major before applying. The first selected segment focuses on teenagers' lack of foresight for future careers, and the second focuses on students needing exposure to classes to decide their major, creating a cohesive counterpoint.

Answer:

Critics argue that teenagers don't have any way of knowing what jobs they will want as adults, so they shouldn't be forced to lock in an area of study before even starting college. Further, students won't know what they want to major in until they have taken a variety of classes; some college students change their minds about what they want to study several times during their first and second years, which would not be possible if they had to choose their area of study before applying.