Question

1. when john marshall declared the law unconstitutional, what else did he do?
2. due to the marbury vs madison case, “the judicial branch became the final interpreter of the constitution and took up the mantle of striking down or upholding laws passed by congress based on their constitutionality.” what does this mean?

Explanation:

1. In addition to declaring a law unconstitutional, John Marshall established the principle of judicial review in Marbury v. Madison, which gave the federal courts the power to determine the constitutionality of laws. This power was crucial in shaping the balance of power among the three branches of government.
2. This statement means that after the Marbury v. Madison case, the judicial branch gained the authority to be the ultimate arbiter of what is and is not in line with the Constitution. It can now review laws passed by Congress and decide whether they are constitutional, either striking them down if unconstitutional or upholding them if they are in accordance with the Constitution. This was a significant expansion of the power of the judicial branch and helped to establish a system of checks - and - balances in the United States government.

Answer:

1. Established the principle of judicial review.
2. The judicial branch can review and decide the constitutionality of congressional laws, acting as the final interpreter of the Constitution for this purpose.