Question

which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? select three options paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article accepting money from a politician to report on an opponent, then donating the money to a charity ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community interviewing the ceos of two insurance companies that are competing against each other using information from a wiki page to clarify information about a topic

Explanation:

• Paying for research - ethically okay as it's self - funded research.
• Ending investigation to avoid harm - shows ethical consideration for community.
• Interviewing competing CEOs is neutral journalistic activity. Accepting money from a politician for a report is biased and using wiki - page info without proper verification may be unreliable.

Answer:

• paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
• ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
• interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other