Question

which statement would best conclude an evaluation of dan delucas argument in \dylans nobel prize settles debate. rock lyncs are poetry\? deluca shows an impressive knowledge of the entire range of dylans creative output overall, delucas wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry i find the examples of internal rhyme to be the most convincing evidence deluca offers deluca calls on novelists and a us president for their opinions of the nobel committees decision

Explanation:

To conclude an evaluation of an argument, a statement that sums up the overall effectiveness of the argument is best. The statement "Overall, DeLuca's wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry" provides a comprehensive summary of the argument's success in proving its point. The other statements focus on specific aspects rather than the overall conclusion of the argument.

Answer:

Overall, DeLuca's wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry